Excessive drinking at W&L linked to sexual assault

A 2009 anonymous health survey given to Washington and Lee undergraduates shows that about 18 percent of female respondents have experienced rape or attempted rape. That’s two times the national college average for sexual assault, says Dr. Jane Horton, Washington and Lee’s director of student health.

The report shows that 39 percent of undergraduate women attending Washington and Lee responded to the survey- 341 women in total.

“We feel comfortable that our survey is representative of our students’ experience here,” said Horton.

I took an in-depth look at sexual assault at Washington and Lee as part of an on-going investigation about gender relations on local college campuses.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Reverie of a reporter

Start small, read everything

For two days, criminal defense lawyers, sports journalists, law students and journalism majors gathered together at Washington and Lee University to discuss the intersection of sports, the law and the media.

Following on the heels of the much-publicized Journalism Ethics Institute which featured notorious former New York Times reporter Jayson Blair, the 3rd annual Media, Courts and the Law Symposium brought its own media and legal powerhouses to the campus for panel discussions about  how the media and the law depend on each other when major sports stars get in trouble.

“When sports, the law and the media collide, they create a perfect storm, particularly in a celebrity-obsessed culture such as ours,” read the program bulletin that was distributed to the more than 60 people who attended the first of the two panels on Wednesday.

 That panel included Christopher Lyons, the lawyer who defended NFL player Donte Stallworth on a DUI manslaughter charge, Larry Woodward, the defense attorney in Michael Vick’s dog-fighting case, Jackie MacMullan, an ESPN columnist and correspondent, and Lee Hawkins, a Wall Street Journal reporter and on-air contributor for CNBC.

The panelists’ discussion was thought-provoking and honest about the ways in which journalists and criminal defense lawyers rely on each other to attain their goals.

“I’ve certainly used the press to my advantage at times,” said Woodward. MacMullan nodded, adding that as a journalist, its important to cultivate relationships with lawyers. That’s how you get the exclusive story, she said, by putting in the time.

But for me, the most rewarding part of the symposium experience was the dinner after Wednesday’s panel, where journalism and law students were able to spend one-on-one time with the panelists over drinks and dinner. Wall Street Journal reporter Lee Hawkins sat at my table and spent most of the night encouraging my fellow journalism majors and me about breaking into the news business.

I think it’s a time of great opportunity for young,ambitious journalists, Hawkins said. Hawkins pointed out that convergence is second nature to young reporters and encouraged us to develop our skills for all media – print, broadcast and online.

Really, when it comes down to is, Hawkins said, you’re all about your clips. Read everything, fact check everything, put in the extra time on the front end before you start writing – if you have good clips and multimedia skills, you’re going to find a job, he said.

But he also advised the “print” journalists at the table to focus on metropolitan papers rather than the “big guys” like the New York Times, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal.

Start small, read everything, he said.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Reverie of a reporter

The new ‘J-team’: saviors of journalism

Caesar Andrews

Caesar Andrews (Courtesy of W&L Journalism Dept.)

Former Editor of the Detroit Free Press Caesar Andrews believes the journalism business will survive. And more than that, he thinks it will thrive.
At least that’s what Andrews, Washington and Lee University’s Reynolds Distinguished Visiting Professor of Journalism, said in a speech to a crowd of about 50 people on Wednesday.

Andrews, whose Detroit Free Press newsroom won last year’s Pulitzer prize for local reporting, said he foresees a new class of journalists- the ‘J-Team’ – who will save the industry – much in the same way the ‘A-Team’ from the 1980s action television series saved the world.

“Instability seems to be the rule of the day,” Andrews said. “But I don’t think for one minute that the business of journalism is down for the count.”

Andrews pointed to three areas of journalism where he found hope, and more than that, growth: business opportunities provided by the Internet, audience opportunities provided by a growing national population and reporting opportunities provided by new, fresh talent in the newsroom.

“[Talent is] the strongest resource in the news media’s future,” he said. “Freshly minted talent free of the baggage of the way news used to be.”

Andrews called for journalism students to tackle the industry with creative, energetic optimism. He said there would always be a need for professionals – trained reporters who continually go beyond the masses, including citizen journalists and bloggers.

But Andrews warned that he no longer believed the fundamentals of great journalism would single-handedly float news organizations by themselves.
That’s where creative thinking about advertising, news delivery and the expanding population comes in, he said.

“The Internet is not delivering the money now, but it’s important to realize [the Internet] is a revolution.”

When questioned about what he thinks will happen to print newspapers and online news publications, Andrews said he didn’t have “any one answer.” But he said he thought the news business was about to go through “seasons of change” as organizations began to experiment with new business models.

“There’s an urgency to the conversation now. People are forced to be a lot bolder,” said Andrews. “It’s about the forward-looking commitment of ‘what are we going to do?’”

What they should do, Andrews’ speech seemed to imply, is look to the new crop of journalists to replace lost experience with new-found professional innovation.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Reverie of a reporter

Gretchen Morgenson talks finance, business journalism

I got the chance to sit down with Gretchen Morgenson, the assistant business editor of the New York Times, while she visited Washington and Lee University.

To Morgenson, miscommunication between borrowers and lenders lies at the heart of the current financial crisis. The Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, who began writing about the mortgage meltdown in early 2007, told me she knew irresponsible lending would lead to a crisis.

But she had no idea how bad it would be.

Now, in the aftermath of lending-gone-wrong, Morgenson says the biggest problem that faces the economy is resolving companies too big to fail.

“This is the crucial, central problem that our leaders in government have not yet dealt with,” she said.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Reverie of a reporter

Can ad exchanges help news publishers make $$?

Publishers are getting ripped off, plain and simple.

At least that was the gist of Erich Wasserman’s speech at Washington and Lee University on Monday. Wasserman, the co-founder and vice president of an online media trading company, said there are three ways in which publishers sell display ads online. But most publishers know about only two ways: Directly sold inventory and indirectly sold inventory/third-party ad networks.

Directly sold inventory is when the publisher sells display ads on its site directly to the ad agency. For example: The New York Times sells a banner ad to Sony. Directly sold inventory guarantees that 100 percent of every dollar from the sale goes to the New York Times.

The downside? Usually, publishers can only sell about 30 to 40 percent of their display ad inventory directly.

Traditionally, this has been where ad networks and indirectly sold inventory step in. A third party ad network comes along and offers to buy the inventory the publisher hasn’t been able to sell. So everything our theoretical New York Times publisher couldn’t sell directly is bought up by an ad network, let’s say Traffic Marketplace.

Traffic Marketplace pays the New York Times, but only about 30 percent what they would be able to sell the inventory for directly. Then, Traffic Marketplace turns around and sells all that display ad space to agencies like Sony at full price.

The bitter end? The New York Times is only making 30 cents for every dollar that Traffic Marketplace makes. Publishers are getting ripped off, and they don’t think there’s another alternative.

But Wasserman says there is.

Enter ad exchanges. (DoubleClick, AdECN, Right Media are the big ones right now.)

(Copyright 2009 by Will Scully-Power)

(Copyright 2009 by Will Scully-Power)

Ad exchanges are ways for publishers (sellers of display ads) and agencies (the buyers) to plug into an open technology platform (provided by the ad exchange) in which ad prices are set in a constantly updating (real-time) auction.

This marketplace basically decides the value of a publisher’s users, which helps set the price for display ads on that publisher’s site. Ad exchanges help publishers to better monetize their Web-sites while improving returns for advertisers, said Wasserman.

He estimates that publishers will get back 85 percent of every dollar spent when they use ad exchanges. That’s a lot better than the 30 percent a publisher will receive for every dollar the ad network collects.

“Forget the ad network,” Wasserman said.

It’s important to remember that Wasserman stands to benefit from publishers turning to ad exchanges because his company partners with them so they can, in turn, partner with agencies.

Still, I think what he said makes a lot of sense. I think publishers don’t have a lot to lose. Why not give ad exchanges a chance? Or do they already?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Reverie of a reporter

Video: VMI Cadet faces rape charges, jury trial

This fall, I am covering cops and courts for the Rockbridge Report – Lexington, Va.’s only local internet and broadcast station. Watch my first broadcast package of the year about former Virginia Military Institute Cadet Stephen Lloyd, who faces a jury trial on rape and sodomy charges:

You can also view this story at the Virginia Voice – online news coverage of Central and Southwest Virginia.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Reverie of a reporter

Creators of News?

Ahh, online journalism ethics.

Yesterday, my conversation with the managing editor of the Athens Banner Herald sputtered to a stop of “ums, ahs, yes, that’s a conundrum…” when she presented me with one of those headache-worthy questions about online journalism:

“With all those user comments, how do you keep from becoming a creator of news rather than just a reporter of news?”

She’s been dealing with this question since the Banner-Herald published an online story about a girl (they didn’t name her) who said she was sexually assaulted. The girl wanted to press charges. The story collected many user comments – people had a lot of opinions and questions about the potential case.

By the end of the day, the girl had dropped the charges.

The Banner-Herald managing editor said her stomach turned as she thought about the possibility that this girl had read all those user comments, realized how difficult defending her sexual history might be and decided not to pursue the case.

Hence the question: “With all those user comments, how do you keep from becoming a creator of news rather than just a reporter of news?”

And the next: Does it matter?

The girl might not have seen the Banner-Herald story. The story and its darned user comments might have had nothing to do with her decision to drop charges. But what if did? Does it matter?

Most reporters are ambiguous about user comments. Yes, it’s a rush to click on your story link and see a string of thirty comments beneath the tagline. It’s the “you like me! you really like me!” feeling.

Ok, maybe it’s more “you read me! You really read me!” But I digress.

It’s also frustrating to see your story pecked at by anonymous people – these so-called “citizen journalists” who aren’t held to the standards you were when you wrote the story.  

As encouraging as it is to see the community engaged and reading the news, comments often devolve into tangential bickering between the users. Sometimes, the arguments have absolutely nothing to do with story. Other times, user comments become a place for personal pontification as users pass judgments about people, things and ideas in the story. 

I can imagine what those comments might’ve been on the Banner-Herald story. As a woman, I can imagine how I would’ve felt to see my actions and my accusations put under the community spotlight even before the police investigated.

Was that decision to drop all charges a result of the Banner-Herald story’s user comments? Did the Banner-Herald create the news?

Most papers have developed guidelines for what can and cannot be said in user comments. At the Charlotte Observer, any profanity or “abusive” speech is prohibited. Such comments were deleted and replaced by the notice “User123′s comments are abusive and have been removed.”

But are there stories where user comments shouldn’t be allowed at all?

And if there are, how to determine which ones get the user comment reprieve?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Reverie of a reporter

Video: Sharing the road

Below is an in-depth broadcast piece on the dangers of Interstate 81 in Virginia that I created last spring for the Rockbridge Report. 

 I-81 used to be a state-of-the-art expressway in the 1960s, but now there’s an average of 20,000 trucks traveling  the road per day. High truck traffic, mountainous terrains and closed rest stops make I-81 one of the deadliest interstates, according to the Virginia Transportation Research Council. One family from Atlanta, Georgia understands the dangers of I-81 all too well.

 

To find out more about I-81 and other important transportation issues in Virgina, please visit reportingonvirginia.wordpress.com.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Reverie of a reporter

What do you think: Print Newspapers

1 Comment

Filed under Reverie of a reporter

Acquiring new arts, keeping old instincts

I recently read “Self Reliance” by Ralph Waldo Emerson for an American Romanticism class I’m taking at Washington and Lee this fall.

I’d read the transcendental, empowering essay a couple times before and had always enjoyed Emerson’s vision of the individual and his rather confusing clarity. This time as I stumbled along his philosophical rhetoric and aphorisms, my attention snagged not on the “hobgoblin of little minds” paragraph that I love so well but on a less familiar passage towards the end of the lecture:

selfreliance“Society never advances. It recedes as fast on one side as it gains on the other. It undergoes continual changes; it is barbarous, it is civilized, it is Christianized, it is rich, it is scientific; but this change is not amelioration. For everything that is given, something is taken. Society acquires new arts, and loses old instincts.”

So new technology at once advances and cripples society, hmm. New technology isn’t necessarily a good thing, hmm.

I know a lot of newspaper people who might agree with that. But I also know plenty of others who think social media and the Internet can only mean a bigger, brighter future not only for the news industry but for the preservation of democracy.

I think new tools like blogs, Twitter, Facebook, HD capacity and all other types of online media will eventually elevate journalism into a more concise, in-depth and accountable industry. But I think Emerson’s words also hold a sort of precautionary warning about what can happen when people rely too heavily on technology to do the “thinking.”

An inaccurate, poorly-written story dressed up with Soundslides, HD video footage and user comments is still going to be an inaccurate, poorly-written story. All the online coding in the world cannot replace original reporting and good copy-editing.

Tweets and Updates and user comments mean nothing if the old reporting instincts are forgotten.

“Society is a wave. The wave moves onward but the water which it is composed does not,” wrote Emerson.

Well, journalism has to be a mountain, reaching up, up towards new possibilities even as it retains its strong foundation. So many journalists are looking to the future, but I think it’s still important to remember the instincts, the successes and the lessons of the past.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Reverie of a reporter